![]() |
| The Pelagios team enjoying the 'Death on the Nile' exhibition at the Fitzwilliam museum in Cambridge, at the launch of Pelagios Commons on 23 February 2016 |
Thursday, 3 March 2016
Pelagios is Moving House
Tuesday, 11 August 2015
Linked Pasts
We'll post links to the presentations shortly, but in the meantime you may want to check out the reports of the people, places and periods breakout groups. A huge thanks to everyone who took part for making it such a success (and especially to Gabriel Bodard who really helped us pull it all together).
| Linked Open Data Ecosystems. With Cats. |
Tuesday, 7 July 2015
Peripleo: a Sneak Preview
There's been quite a loooong silence on this blog about our tool development activities. Not that we've been idle. Far from it: we've been as busy as ever in our top-secret underground hideaway. Those of you following us on twitter may have noticed the occasional screenshot or info-bite leaking out. But today we're finally ready to give you a first comprehensive sneak preview of what we've been up to: the development of a spatio-temporal search engine for Pelagios. Everyone, meet Peripleo.
Peripleo is Greek for "to sail (or swim) around", and the notion of being able to freely navigate the "sea of open data", collectively brought together by our partners (and discovering the treasures hidden in remote places and ancient times!) is exactly what we had in mind when we started out.
Example 1: Tetradrachm
To see how Peripleo works, let's take a swim through two examples. First, let's search for 'tetradrachm', a particular coin type. This brings us to the following result, shown in Fig. 1: a total of 23,346 hits, and a map with a distribution of lots of small dots (and one slightly larger than the rest), indicating where those results are located. We also get some preview images for our results.
Fig.1 Search results for 'tetradrachm'.
Let's flip open the 'filters' panel to find out a bit more about those results (Fig.2). The filters panel shows us how our result data are organised. In this case, it tells us that most results come from the American Numismatic Society Collection, with a small fraction of hits (hovering the mouse over the bars tells us there are nine) coming from the Fralin | UVa Art Museum Numismatic Collection. We can also see how our results are distributed over time, between the 6th century BC and 3rd century AD, with the peak at around 300 BC.
Fig.2 Filter panel.
We can go exploring further too, by, for example, zooming in on Sicily (Fig. 3). Since the information on our side panels will update live as we go, we can see how our results change as we zoom in. We can see that our current map area contains a subset of 892 results (out of our total of 23,346). Interestingly, we can also see that the distribution over time has changed: results around Sicily date roughly to between 500 and 200 BC, i.e. to the earlier phase of our total result set.
The biggest dot in the region indicates the place with the most results. Clicking it reveals that it's Syracusae, and that 520 of our 892 results in the area are linked to it. We can move the map around to explore how the temporal distribution differs in other areas; and all the time Peripleo will live-update the contents of the filter panel, as well as the image previews.
Fig.3 Results around Sicily.
Let's take a break and zoom back out, so that we can view all our results again. You may notice handles around that blue time distribution graphic. These handles are draggable. Let's pull them to select a time range in the beginning of the graphic: somewhere between 500 and 400 BC, say. Peripleo now shows results only from that time span. If we drag the selected range across the graphic, we'll see how the geographical spread of our results changes over time. Fig. 4 shows the map at the start (Fig.4, left) and end (Fig.4, right) positions of this shift, with distinctively different 'footprints' at the beginning and end of the overall time period.
Fig.4 Results filtered by time.
Needless to say, once you have narrowed down your search to specific items you are particularly interested in, you can go directly to the source of the data. In our case, it could be one of these item pages at the American Numismatic Society MANTIS system, for example.
Example 2: Theatres
Let's try another example and search for the term 'theatre'. This time, Peripleo comes up with a handy set of 483 results (plus some corresponding preview images). The filters panel tells us that results come primarily from Vici.org and the Flickr photostream of the Aerial Photographic Archive for Archaeology in the Middle East. Before exploring any further, though, let's first switch the backdrop to an aerial imagery baselayer (Fig. 5).
Fig.5 Map layer settings dialog.
Now let's move the map to a region we're interested in, say North Africa. Again, thumbnail images will update as we go along; and hovering over a thumbnail will place a marker at the location the thumbnail is from. Let's take a closer look at one of the results by clicking on its thumbnail (Fig. 6).
Fig.6 Aerial imagery baselayer.
The map will zoom in on the place we selected: a Roman theatre at Djemila, Algeria, that's recorded in Vici.org. Peripleo indicates that no additional data is linked directly to the theatre. But let's see whether we can find something interesting in the area around it. We can do this by clicking the blue 'explore this area' button, next to the search box. Peripleo brings up markers for other places nearby, sized according to how much data there is available for them. In this case, we can, for example, quickly spot the marker for Cuicul, the main settlement, which is linked to 133 inscriptions recorded in the Epigraphic Database Heidelberg.
Fig.7 Exploring an area.
But Wait - There's More!
This illustrates some of the things that you'll be able to do with Peripleo. But there are more things coming! For example: the scenarios above might give the impression that Peripleo is limited to treating places as points; and each item needs to be located at one specific place. That's not the case. Places in Peripleo can cover regions - see e.g. a search for 'galliae' in Fig. 8 (left) below. (Peripleo makes use of the Creative Commons 'Polygon Shapes for Pleiades Regions' dataset by Pedar Foss, AWMC.) Items can be connected to anything from a single place, to thousands - see e.g. a search for 'vicarello' in Fig. 8 (right), which returns, among other things, the Vicarello Beakers and the entire Itinerarium Gaditanum inscribed on them (along with the beautiful CC-BY photographs by Ryan Baumann).
Fig.8 Regions (left) and complex items (right).
We feel that Peripleo offers a tantalising glimpse into a new way of doing research, of discovering what's in the data, and revealing connections that would otherwise have been much harder to trace. Yet this work marks only the first steps towards tapping into the vast potential of the digital resources brought together by our partners, collectively and openly. That is to say, Peripleo is still a work in progress. Or, as I like to say, playing with Peripleo isn't "beta testing" just yet, but rather like taking a stroll across a busy construction site. Nonetheless: we're really eager to get first test users into the system, and find out what YOU think. What works? What doesn't?
So, if you're not afraid to put on your hard hat, and don't mind stumbling across the occasional unfinished area - we'd love to invite you to have a play with Peripleo yourself. Do drop us a line if you're interested to take a look & we'll give you access right away. We'd love to hear your feedback!
Thursday, 11 June 2015
Return to Gaul
Due to our background, we were immediately interested in the way literary texts are dealt with in Pelagios. The idea was to choose a text and mark up all place names we would find with the Recogito tool. Our aim was to have a direct experience of the issues raised by digital editing, one of the core activities of digital humanists. Through the actual marking up of Rutilius Namatianus' De reditu suo (a text describing his return from Rome to Gaul – see the map) and the collaborative revision process, we realised that it was not that easy, in some cases, to determine whether a word was indeed a place name and, if so, whether it had to be marked up and indicated on the map. For instance, one special feature of ancient texts is that they frequently refer to mythological places. But is a mythological place really a place in this context? Should we mark up Mount Olympus when it appears as the home of the Greek gods?
When a place is designated by the name of the people who live there, it is not always clear whether the narrator means the country or the people. Marking up texts thus turned out to be a captivating, even philosophical, activity and those who claim it tiresome have, no doubt, malicious tongues.
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Linked Pasts
Refreshments (tea/coffee, lunch) will be provided, along with a reception on Monday evening.
The event is free of charge but places are limited. Please reserve your place through Eventbrite.
Day 1
Welcome – Pelagios: A Linked Pasts Ecosystem?
Keynote – Sebastian Heath (NYU), Does a Linked Future Mean Past Understanding?
Session 1
Time – Ryan Shaw (UNC), An Ecosystem of Time Periods: PeriodO
Geo – Ruth Mostern (UC Merced), An Ecosystem of Places: Gazetteers
People – Gabriel Bodard (KCL), An Ecosystem of People: SNAP
Session 2
Open Data – Mia Ridge (OU), Trends and Practice within Cultural Heritage
Classification schemes – Antoine Isaac (Amsterdam), Europeana
Day 2
Session 3: Towards an Infrastructure
Rainer Simon (AIT): The Recogito Annotation Platform
Humphrey Southall (Portsmouth): PastPlace gazetteer
Guenther Goerz (Erlangen): WissKI
Holly Wright/Doug Tudhope: Ariadne
Session 4
Structured Activity 1: Niches (Space, Time, People)
Structured Activity 2: Nutrition Cycles (Open Data, Classification, Infrastructure)
Wrap up: feedback, next steps + community actions
**Linked data goodness brought to you by elton, leif, rainer + pau**
***The colloquium is made possible by the generosity of our funders, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the AHRC***
Friday, 13 February 2015
Medieval sea-charts - centuries before their time
It's hard to describe the appearance of a portolan chart - the medieval answer to the modern Admiralty chart - if you haven't already been able to see one. Very few early examples are freely available online but you can find a chart of 1403 here: http://brbl-dl.library.yale.edu/vufind/Record/3521236. Probably originating in the 13th century, though not everybody agrees about that, the portolan charts present the
**Former map librarian of the British Library (1987-2001), since 1993 Tony Campbell has been chairman of Imago Mundi Ltd, in which capacity he acts as co-ordinator for the biennial International Conference on the History of Cartography. He is working on Pelagios 4 as the expert adviser on portolan charts.
Thursday, 15 January 2015
What Do You Do with a Million Links?
The Pelagios team had a paper entitled 'What Do You Do with a Million Links?' accepted at the Digital Classics Association organised session at the Society of Classical Studies in New Orleans this month. Sadly, none of us were able to attend in person so to make our contribution we recorded an audio ppt which you can download from the link above (it's 212MB so you'll want a reasonable internet connection). Let us know what you would do with a million links!
A huge thanks to Neil Coffee and all involved for bringing the session together.
Thursday, 13 November 2014
Bringing About the SEA CHANGE
About two weeks ago, on Friday October 31, we held the first of two annotation workshops funded through the Open Humanities Awards, designed to gather data through our Recogito "crowdsourcing" interface. The Heidelberg University Institute of Geography kindly agreed to be our host for this inaugural event. A big thank you goes to Lukas Loos for setting up our visit and taking care of local organization, and to Armin Volkmann for his spontaneous decision to merge his geo-archaeology seminar with our workshop on that day.
And with what an effect. We were blown away by the results! In just two hours, our 27 participants made 6.620 contributions to 51 different documents (19 text and 32 maps). We've written a comprehensive report over at the DM2E blog. Be sure not to miss it!
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
Greece (is the Time, is the Place, is the Motion)
Thursday, 2 October 2014
“How many miles to Babylon?”
The answer to this famous nursery rhyme – “three score and ten”, i.e. 70 km – seems outrageously high for a day's journey, no matter “if your heels are [exceptionally] nimble and light”. (Even swift-footed Achilles would struggle to cover 70 km in day!) So, what are we to make of it? How can we evaluate such a distance number?
This is where the "database ancient measurements" comes in. The project was initially sponsored by Berlin's excellence cluster TOPOI and is managed now by my IT whiz Rainer Streng who set it up in MS Access and programmed data exports into "Google Earth" and applications in "ArcGIS 10". Irina Tupikova, who by day is an astronomer and mathematician, is also working on Ptolemy's data, recalculating the spherical coordinates to the original measurements.
As far as we know, there is no comparable collection of this kind. Right now, our database includes nearly 100 ancient authors and their works, especially ancient geographers and historians (Strabo, Pliny, Herodotus, Thucydides etc.), but also minor authors like the pseudo-Aristotelian work de mundo or Horace's Satires. All in all we have in our database 2466 "distances", i.e., attested routes with two points and a number. (Among them eleven routes for Babylon, and even bigger figures for a "day´s journey" than the 70 km in the nursery rhyme, if you are interested!)
What can one do with these data? We think: a lot! To start with:
- How accurate and reliable were ancient measurements data?
- What units are attested and how do they relate to each other? This is a basic and notorious question in the field of ancient metrology.
- Who measured or rather estimated distances in antiquity? Soldiers, explorers, merchants? Were there any attempts to map a whole country or empire and standardize the many distances in antiquity? If so, was this a "bottom-up" process done by practitioners like seamen or merchants or a "top-down" one, organized by a central administration?
But there are potentially much more searching questions, such as:
- How does an ancient author employ numbers, especially distances as a means to engage with his readership, in order to bring home his own ideas or concepts? Authors like Herodotus or Thucydides were very careful (and sometimes even deceptive!) in using numbers in their narratives.
- How can we use measurement data to explore one of the most basic, important and comparable properties of space is its extension, its spatiality? If researchers concern themselves with spaces, they should not ignore this aspect (as they mostly do). Distances are a means to evaluate the different concepts of space the ancients had in mind. But they allow us also to reconstruct not only the real maps of ancient geographers but also the "mental maps" of merchants, soldiers, intellectuals etc.
- How can a corpus of ancient measurement data allow us to reconstruct ancient routes and waterways and, in addition, social phenomena like migration or mobility? The ambitious application Rainer works on now, is an ancient network of ancient routes and waterways (something like Orbis or Omnes Viae, but based on our measurement data).
To give just a small example:
The green line depicts the route between Tridentum and Rome, a route, which according
to the "codex Theodosianus" (6.28.1) can be covered in 34 days. 34 days of travel
are "normally" equivalent to c. 850 km (a day´s journey calculated as 25 km). The
linear distance according to Google Earth is 477.58 km. But our ArcGIS model shows that
the route on known Roman roads is in fact 90 km longer, i.e. 567.40 km.
The meetings with the nimble-footed Pelagios team (zigzagging between several locations all over Berlin in one and a half days) helped us sharpen our own profile and scientific approach tremendously. Fine-tuning our data and making it compatible and interoperable with the other Pelagios partners will be undertaken over the upcoming months. Watch this space!
Monday, 29 September 2014
Taking to the high seas: introducing Pelagios phase 4
This month sees the start of another new and exciting phase of Pelagios. With funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council's Digital Transformations programme, we will be exploring the transformative potential of our linked open data network for doing research. In short our brief is to address the question, "ok, now we can link stuff online—so what?"
In response to the challenge posed by "data silos" (the mass of independently produced material uploaded onto the Web), since 2011 we have been developing the means of linking online resources via their common references to place. This has involved "annotating" the place names found in documents and aligning those references to a global gazetteer service (for the ancient world, this is Pleiades). Using Pleiades's Uniform Resource Identifiers (or "social security numbers") for each ancient place as our glue, it is now possible to agree that places mentioned in different materials are one and the same (e.g. Classical Athens and not "Athens, Georgia"). Users are now able to move seamlessly between and search the records of a growing list of international partners.
Thus each place annotation made in the document doesn’t just attach useful spatial information to a resource; it also provides a way of linking to other resources. But, as Andrew Prescott, leader of the AHRC’s Digital Transformations strand, has recently written: 'Scholarship is much harder than [the ability to link]: we need to be clear about why we are linking data, what sort of data we are linking, and our aim in doing so'. Our one-year grant from the AHRC looks to unlock the potential of our place network to reveal previously unknown connections between different places and different documents (texts, databases, maps, etc.).
In particular what we want to do is to use these new links between different documents to rethink key periods in the history of cartography. Until now digital resources have largely concerned issues of accuracy and visualization; i.e. to pinpoint the locations of ancient places with respect to our contemporary topography. What we want to do, rather, is to try to reconstruct and interpret the markedly different ways in which pre-modern authors and mapmakers conceptualized the world. Turning the spotlight on to five moments in time, Pelagios 4 will explore how ancient or pre-modern authors used various means to grasp, represent and communicate spatial knowledge of the world around them.
To conduct this research Pelagios is happy to announce the following scholarly collaborators:
- Pascal Arnaud, Professor of History at UniversitƩ Lyon 2 and senior member of the Institut universitaire de France (IUF), is the leading specialist in ancient geography and navigation.
- Tony Campbell is former head of the British Library’s ‘Map Room’ and the pre-eminent expert on Portolan Charts.
- Marianne O'Doherty, Lecturer in English at the University of Southampton, has published on medieval European travel narratives, geography and cartography.
- Klaus Geus, Chair of Ancient Geography at FU Berlin, co-ordinates the TOPOI Excellence Cluster in ‘Common Sense Geography’. He is joined by Irina Tupikova, a leading mathematical astronomer with an interest in the history of science.
We look forward to working with these scholars and rethinking the ways in which geographic space was imagined and represented before the advent of modern Cartesian cartography.
Portolan chart by Jorge de Aguiar (1492), the oldest known
signed and dated chart of Portuguese origin.
Tuesday, 24 June 2014
What Have the Romans Ever Mapped for Us? Results from the Latin Geographic Tradition
Having recently completed our first content workpackage (CWP1), dedicated to Early Geospatial Documents from the Latin Tradition, we'd like to take this opportunity to share the annotation data that we've compiled so far. Overall we have completed annotating place references in 33 documents (41 if we include additional language versions of the same document). Within these documents, we've identified 19,880 toponyms, and were able to establish mappings to Pleiades in 15,721 cases (79%).
You can find the complete list of our documents, along with a download link for the data, below. The annotations are stored in CSV format - i.e. they can be opened in a spreadsheet application, or imported into a database or GIS.
An additional part of our work in CWP1 (which will be important too for all our content work packages) has been to identify additional relevant documents as we go along. Our list of "geospatial documents" has therefore grown quite substantially. We have included these documents in our annotation tool Recogito. You can follow their status directly on Recogito's Latin Tradition landing page.
Now that we have finished work on the first of our six traditions, we are keen to get your feedback. In particular:
- We look forward to seeing what and how you make use of these data. We're sure that you'll use them in ways that we can't anticipate, and we'd love you to share that with us!
- The large number of documents, the ambiguity of the evidence and the comparatively short space of time mean that some of our identifications will inevitably be wrong or open to debate. We are planning a mechanism to allow people to suggest alternative suggestions or to indicate agreement and disagreement. In the meantime, feel free to contact us if you have proposals for corrections. We're also happy to hear suggestions for other early latin geographic documents which we may have missed.
- Since, as we expected, we could not fully annotate or geo-resolve all of our documents, we're interested in hearing from people who might be willing to join us in the challenge. If you would like to join in and help find places in the incomplete documents, feel free to get in touch and we may be able to provide you with a Recogito account. We'll have to roll this out slowly since Recogito is not a 'community tool' as such (with features such as full moderation, user profiles, etc) so please be aware that there may be a wait if we get a lot of volunteers!
-
Agrippa Fragments.
113 toponyms. 80 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] -
Milestone of Allichamps
3 toponyms. 3 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Pomponius Mela: De Chorographia (around 43 CE)
2186 toponyms. 1778 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Laterculus of Valencia (post 100 CE)
11 toponyms. 11 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Lavs Alexandriae (post 180 CE)
5 toponyms. 5 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Piazzale delle Corporazioni, Ostia (175 - 200 CE)
14 toponyms. 14 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Hadrian's Wall Fort Vessels (100 - 300 CE)
16 toponyms. 16 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Solinus: C. IVLII SOLINI (225 - 275 CE)
598 toponyms. 478 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Itinerarium de Astorga (267 - 276 CE)
47 toponyms. 45 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Divisio Orbis Terrarum (300 - 400 CE)
167 toponyms. 153 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Vicarello Beakers (around 200 - 400 CE)
438 toponyms. 438 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] -
Ammaedara Mosaic (275 - 325 CE)
12 toponyms. 12 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Laterculus Veronensis (304 - 324? CE)
101 toponyms. 93 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink]. -
Nomina Provinciarvm Omnium (312 CE)
154 toponyms. 136 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Bordeaux Itinerary (333 CE).
612 toponyms. 589 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Bordeaux Itinerary - English translation (333 CE)
643 toponyms. 617 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Avenius: Ora Maritima (300 - 400 CE).
269 toponyms. 168 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Avenius: Ora Maritima (300 - 400 CE) - Spanish translation
277 toponyms. 197 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Ex Cronographo Anni P. Chr. 354 (354 CE)
47 toponyms. 30 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Sextus Festus: Breviarium of the Accomplishments of the Roman People (379 CE)
420 toponyms. 329 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Sextus Festus: Breviarium of the Accomplishments of the Roman People (379 CE) - English translation
400 toponyms. 320 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Peregrinatio Aetheriae (381 - 384 CE)
269 toponyms. 173 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Peregrinatio Aetheriae (381 - 384 CE) - English translation
383 toponyms. 260 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Notitia Dignitatum (390 - 420? CE)
1505 toponyms. 1164 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Notitia Dignitatum (390 - 420? CE) - English translation
719 toponyms. 570 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Ammianus Marcellinus: Roman History (before 391 CE)
945 toponyms. 693 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Ammianus Marcellinus: Roman History (before 391 CE) - English translation
956 toponyms. 784 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Dimensuratio Provinciarum (300 - 500 CE)
192 toponyms. 179 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Notitia Galliarum (375 - 425 CE)
142 toponyms. 93 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Pseudo-Plutarch: About Rivers And Mountains And Things Found In Them (200 - 400 CE) - English translation
288 toponyms. 242 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink (PDF)] -
Rutilius Namatianus: A Voyage Home to Gaul (416 CE) - English translation
88 toponyms. 83 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Orosius: A History, against the Pagans (416 - 417 CE) - English translation
573 toponyms. 429 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Iulii Honorii: Excerpta Eius Sphaerae vel Continenta (320 - 440 CE)
1167 toponyms. 868 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Polemius Silvius: Ex Laterculo (448 - 449 CE)
160 toponyms. 137 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Peutinger Table (400 - 500 CE)
3456 toponyms. 2679 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink: Rome's World] [Source Weblink: OmnesViae] -
Jordanes: De Origine Actibusque Getarum (500 - 600 CE)
260 toponyms. 155 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Jordanes: De Origine Actibusque Getarum (500 - 600 CE) - English translation
209 toponyms. 137 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] -
Isidore of Seville: Etymologiae (600 - 700 CE)
1888 toponyms. 1487 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Exordivm (around AD 700)
21 toponyms. 12 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Bede: Historiam ecclesiasticam nostrae insulae ac gentis (703 CE)
63 toponyms. 32 Pleiades matches.
[CSV] [Source Weblink] -
Bede: Historiam ecclesiasticam nostrae insulae ac gentis (703 CE) - English translation
63 toponyms. 32 Pleiades matches.
[CSV]












%2C_f.2_-_BL_Royal_MS_14_C_VII.jpg)



