Thursday, 3 March 2016

Pelagios is Moving House

You are now being redirected to the new home of Pelagios on the web http://commons.pelagios.org/
Despite a period of silence on our blog the Pelagios team have, as ever, been hard at work. This has included participation in workshops and seminars across Europe to promote and inform about our linked data approach, from UmeƄ to Athens. But the big news is that we have been awarded further funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation!

For this new stage of the project, Pelagios is becoming a Commons. We will be nurturing Special Interest Groups (SIGs) dedicated either to investigating particular historical periods—from antiquity to the modern era—or creating new tools, services and resources for discovering and representing historical geography. These SIGs will have access to funds in order to hold international workshops and create resources of mutual benefit, such as maps, datasets or software. They will also be responsible for the overall governance of Pelagios Commons. 


In order to meet the aims of this new and important phase, we will be moving to a new platform. Yes, we are bidding a fond farewell to Blogger, after five years of hosting our conversation. Instead, we invite you all to our new home, http://commons.pelagios.org/, where you will find more details about Pelagios Commons and our tools, resources and documentation all on one site.

We hope to see you there very shortly!
The Pelagios team enjoying the 'Death on the Nile' exhibition at the Fitzwilliam museum
in Cambridge, at the launch of Pelagios Commons on 23 February 2016 

Tuesday, 11 August 2015

Linked Pasts

As Pelagios 3 and 4 are getting close to wrap up, we hosted an event at KCL in London called Linked Pasts. We've been meaning to write a post about it but our friend and fellow-LOD-traveller Holly Wright has just done a terrific job describing it over at the ARIADNE blog and so it seems to make sense to point you over there. We're hoping to arrange similar events in future so if you're interested in how the Linked Open Data ecosystem for the humanities is evolving then let us know and perhaps even consider hosting it!

We'll post links to the presentations shortly, but in the meantime you may want to check out the reports of the people, places and periods breakout groups. A huge thanks to everyone who took part for making it such a success (and especially to Gabriel Bodard who really helped us pull it all together).

Linked Open Data Ecosystems. With Cats.









Tuesday, 7 July 2015

Peripleo: a Sneak Preview

There's been quite a loooong silence on this blog about our tool development activities. Not that we've been idle. Far from it: we've been as busy as ever in our top-secret underground hideaway. Those of you following us on twitter may have noticed the occasional screenshot or info-bite leaking out. But today we're finally ready to give you a first comprehensive sneak preview of what we've been up to: the development of a spatio-temporal search engine for Pelagios. Everyone, meet Peripleo.

Peripleo is Greek for "to sail (or swim) around", and the notion of being able to freely navigate the "sea of open data", collectively brought together by our partners (and discovering the treasures hidden in remote places and ancient times!) is exactly what we had in mind when we started out.

Example 1: Tetradrachm

To see how Peripleo works, let's take a swim through two examples. First, let's search for 'tetradrachm', a particular coin type. This brings us to the following result, shown in Fig. 1: a total of 23,346 hits, and a map with a distribution of lots of small dots (and one slightly larger than the rest), indicating where those results are located. We also get some preview images for our results.

Fig.1 Search results for 'tetradrachm'.

Let's flip open the 'filters' panel to find out a bit more about those results (Fig.2). The filters panel shows us how our result data are organised. In this case, it tells us that most results come from the American Numismatic Society Collection, with a small fraction of hits (hovering the mouse over the bars tells us there are nine) coming from the Fralin | UVa Art Museum Numismatic Collection. We can also see how our results are distributed over time, between the 6th century BC and 3rd century AD, with the peak at around 300 BC.

Fig.2 Filter panel.

We can go exploring further too, by, for example, zooming in on Sicily (Fig. 3). Since the information on our side panels will update live as we go, we can see how our results change as we zoom in. We can see that our current map area contains a subset of 892 results (out of our total of 23,346). Interestingly, we can also see that the distribution over time has changed: results around Sicily date roughly to between 500 and 200 BC, i.e. to the earlier phase of our total result set.

The biggest dot in the region indicates the place with the most results. Clicking it reveals that it's Syracusae, and that 520 of our 892 results in the area are linked to it. We can move the map around to explore how the temporal distribution differs in other areas; and all the time Peripleo will live-update the contents of the filter panel, as well as the image previews.

Fig.3 Results around Sicily.

Let's take a break and zoom back out, so that we can view all our results again. You may notice handles around that blue time distribution graphic. These handles are draggable. Let's pull them to select a time range in the beginning of the graphic: somewhere between 500 and 400 BC, say. Peripleo now shows results only from that time span. If we drag the selected range across the graphic, we'll see how the geographical spread of our results changes over time. Fig. 4 shows the map at the start (Fig.4, left) and end (Fig.4, right) positions of this shift, with distinctively different 'footprints' at the beginning and end of the overall time period.

Fig.4 Results filtered by time.

Needless to say, once you have narrowed down your search to specific items you are particularly interested in, you can go directly to the source of the data. In our case, it could be one of these item pages at the American Numismatic Society MANTIS system, for example.

Example 2: Theatres

Let's try another example and search for the term 'theatre'. This time, Peripleo comes up with a handy set of 483 results (plus some corresponding preview images). The filters panel tells us that results come primarily from Vici.org and the Flickr photostream of the Aerial Photographic Archive for Archaeology in the Middle East. Before exploring any further, though, let's first switch the backdrop to an aerial imagery baselayer (Fig. 5).

Fig.5 Map layer settings dialog.

Now let's move the map to a region we're interested in, say North Africa. Again, thumbnail images will update as we go along; and hovering over a thumbnail will place a marker at the location the thumbnail is from. Let's take a closer look at one of the results by clicking on its thumbnail (Fig. 6).

Fig.6 Aerial imagery baselayer.

The map will zoom in on the place we selected: a Roman theatre at Djemila, Algeria, that's recorded in Vici.org. Peripleo indicates that no additional data is linked directly to the theatre. But let's see whether we can find something interesting in the area around it. We can do this by clicking the blue 'explore this area' button, next to the search box. Peripleo brings up markers for other places nearby, sized according to how much data there is available for them. In this case, we can, for example, quickly spot the marker for Cuicul, the main settlement, which is linked to 133 inscriptions recorded in the Epigraphic Database Heidelberg.

Fig.7 Exploring an area.

But Wait - There's More!

This illustrates some of the things that you'll be able to do with Peripleo. But there are more things coming! For example: the scenarios above might give the impression that Peripleo is limited to treating places as points; and each item needs to be located at one specific place. That's not the case. Places in Peripleo can cover regions - see e.g. a search for 'galliae' in Fig. 8 (left) below. (Peripleo makes use of the Creative Commons 'Polygon Shapes for Pleiades Regions' dataset by Pedar Foss, AWMC.) Items can be connected to anything from a single place, to thousands - see e.g. a search for 'vicarello' in Fig. 8 (right), which returns, among other things, the Vicarello Beakers and the entire Itinerarium Gaditanum inscribed on them (along with the beautiful CC-BY photographs by Ryan Baumann).

Fig.8 Regions (left) and complex items (right).

We feel that Peripleo offers a tantalising glimpse into a new way of doing research, of discovering what's in the data, and revealing connections that would otherwise have been much harder to trace. Yet this work marks only the first steps towards tapping into the vast potential of the digital resources brought together by our partners, collectively and openly. That is to say, Peripleo is still a work in progress. Or, as I like to say, playing with Peripleo isn't "beta testing" just yet, but rather like taking a stroll across a busy construction site. Nonetheless: we're really eager to get first test users into the system, and find out what YOU think. What works? What doesn't?

So, if you're not afraid to put on your hard hat, and don't mind stumbling across the occasional unfinished area - we'd love to invite you to have a play with Peripleo yourself. Do drop us a line if you're interested to take a look & we'll give you access right away. We'd love to hear your feedback!

Thursday, 11 June 2015

Return to Gaul

This post has been written by first-year students of the master "HumanitƩs classiques et humanitƩs numƩriques".

We are French students in the master “Classical Humanities and Digital Humanities” at Paris-Ouest Nanterre La DĆ©fense University. One of our courses is a short collaborative project and we decided to contribute to Pelagios. The interdisciplinary and contributive nature of this project on ancient places makes it very relevant for students like us.

Due to our background, we were immediately interested in the way literary texts are dealt with in Pelagios. The idea was to choose a text and mark up all place names we would find with the Recogito tool. Our aim was to have a direct experience of the issues raised by digital editing, one of the core activities of digital humanists. Through the actual marking up of Rutilius Namatianus' De reditu suo (a text describing his return from Rome to Gaul – see the map) and the collaborative revision process, we realised that it was not that easy, in some cases, to determine whether a word was indeed a place name and, if so, whether it had to be marked up and indicated on the map. For instance, one special feature of ancient texts is that they frequently refer to mythological places. But is a mythological place really a place in this context? Should we mark up Mount Olympus when it appears as the home of the Greek gods?

When a place is designated by the name of the people who live there, it is not always clear whether the narrator means the country or the people. Marking up texts thus turned out to be a captivating, even philosophical, activity and those who claim it tiresome have, no doubt, malicious tongues.


Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Linked Pasts

The Pelagios project is pleased to announce a two-day colloquium on the subject of “Linked Pasts”, 20-21 July 2015, at KCL (The Great Hall, The Strand Campus). Bringing together leading exponents of Linked Data from across the Humanities and Cultural Heritage sector, we address some of the challenges to developing a digital ecosystem of online open materials, through two days of position papers, discussion and breakout group activity. Day 1 will tackle the themes of Time, Geo and People, and issues of Open Data, Classification Schemes and Infrastructure. Day 2 will be devoted to two parallel structured activities, one exploring Niches (space, time, people), and the other Nutrition Cycles (open data, classification, infrastructure). For details of the line up of talks and contributors, see below.

Refreshments (tea/coffee, lunch) will be provided, along with a reception on Monday evening.

The event is free of charge but places are limited. Please reserve your place through Eventbrite.


Matthew Paris: Itinerary from London to Jerusalem. CC0
(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_by_Matthew_Paris)

Day 1
   Welcome – Pelagios: A Linked Pasts Ecosystem?
   Keynote – Sebastian Heath (NYU), Does a Linked Future Mean Past Understanding?    

Session 1       
   Time – Ryan Shaw (UNC), An Ecosystem of Time Periods: PeriodO
   Geo – Ruth Mostern (UC Merced), An Ecosystem of Places: Gazetteers
   People – Gabriel Bodard (KCL), An Ecosystem of People: SNAP
           
Session 2       
   Open Data – Mia Ridge (OU), Trends and Practice within Cultural Heritage
   Classification schemes – Antoine Isaac (Amsterdam), Europeana

Day 2 
Session 3: Towards an Infrastructure
   Rainer Simon (AIT): The Recogito Annotation Platform
   Humphrey Southall (Portsmouth): PastPlace gazetteer
   Guenther Goerz (Erlangen): WissKI
   Holly Wright/Doug Tudhope: Ariadne

Session 4
   Structured Activity 1: Niches (Space, Time, People)
   Structured Activity 2: Nutrition Cycles (Open Data, Classification, Infrastructure)   
           
Wrap up: feedback, next steps + community actions

**Linked data goodness brought to you by elton, leif, rainer + pau**
***The colloquium is made possible by the generosity of our funders, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the AHRC***


Friday, 13 February 2015

Medieval sea-charts - centuries before their time

Figure 1: Annotating portolan charts in Recogito


It's hard to describe the appearance of a portolan chart - the medieval answer to the modern Admiralty chart - if you haven't already been able to see one.  Very few early examples are freely available online but you can find a chart of 1403 here: http://brbl-dl.library.yale.edu/vufind/Record/3521236. Probably originating in the 13th century, though not everybody agrees about that, the portolan charts present the Old World with immediate recognisability.  Covering the coastlines of the Mediterranean and Black Seas, along with the Atlantic shoreline up to Denmark (and the British Isles), they contradict every normal preconception about medieval cartography. You don't need to have Italy, the Nile delta, Crimea and so on pointed out.  They are where you would expect and pretty much how they ought to be.

Why Pelagios 3 devotes an entire segment to the 'portolan' world though is because of their dense toponymy. Taking into account all the islands, an average chart lists perhaps 2000 ports and harbours, as well as natural features, especially the headlands which served as reference points for sailors.

Besides the portolan charts we also have access to portolan texts or, to help distinguish the two formats, the Italian term, portolano / portolani.  Two of those survive from the 13th century, also the likely date (at its very end) of the Carte Pisane that is generally considered the oldest extant chart.  Whereas the delineation of the coastlines had, by about 1340, broadly reached the form that would be repeated for several centuries, the place-names were being steadily updated.  Given the Pelagios terminal date of 1492, that gives us a changing toponymy from three centuries of written navigational guides and two in the case of the charts.

The portolan component will both enrich Pelagios and, we hope, benefit from it. Less than half the coastal toponyms on the oldest portolani, the 'Liber de existencia riveriarum' (early 13th century) and 'Lo compasso de navegare' (dated 1296), are found on the other, and a sizeable number do not appear on the charts at all.  Likewise the toponymy of the Carte Pisane, and two other anonymous charts associated with it  (now preserved in Cortona and Lucca) partly overlap with one another but also have hundreds of names not seen elsewhere.  Considered together, these are rich sources for historians of medieval navigation and trade, since their inclusion in these works must point to them having a perceived significance at the time - even more so for the roughly one in five names that were picked out in red on the charts.

Overall, and leaving aside the islands, there are about 2000 mainland names that can be tied to a dated chart or atlas before 1492 and something like a further 600 noted only in one or other of the portolani texts or undated charts.  Conveniently, both the portolani narratives and the nautical charts provide a geographically linear toponymic catalogue for the Mediterranean and Black Sea. When the current name can be recognised in its medieval equivalent, or where the successive re-naming has been documented, those fixed points can then be used to locate the approximate present-day position of unidentified names. The most helpful source for this matching exercise will be 19th and 20th-century maps and Admiralty charts produced before expanding ports, or the general touristification of the sandy bits in between, gobbled up the old names, and often what they represented as well.  Early gazetteers can help to corroborate the guesswork.

That describes the potential contribution that the rich maritime data can make to Pelagios.  In exchange, portolan historians anticipate the help that other medieval maps and texts can give with the modern identification of some of the more elusive toponyms they have been wrestling with.  Regional historians and archaeologists may also appreciate being introduced to what will be a new source to many of them.


The toponymy for some of the portolan regions have already been documented in detail (N.E. Spain, the Adriatic and the Black Sea). Besides what is being extracted from the original documents by the Pelagios team, the remainder will be sourced from a comprehensive listing that was compiled originally in preparation for a chapter in Volume 1 of The History of  Cartography (University of Chicago Press, 1987) and then fleshed out and expanded over recent years.  The resulting Excel spreadsheet is publicly accessible at http://www.maphistory.info/PortolanChartToponymyFullTableREVISED.xls, where it forms part of a detailed ongoing investigation into the portolan charts (http://www.maphistory.info/portolan.html).

**Former map librarian of the British Library (1987-2001), since 1993 Tony Campbell has been chairman of Imago Mundi Ltd, in which capacity he acts as co-ordinator for the biennial International Conference on the History of Cartography. He is working on Pelagios 4 as the expert adviser on portolan charts.

Thursday, 15 January 2015

What Do You Do with a Million Links?


Figure 1: The Pelagios 3 graph of data


The Pelagios team had a paper entitled 'What Do You Do with a Million Links?' accepted at the Digital Classics Association organised session at the Society of Classical Studies in New Orleans this month. Sadly, none of us were able to attend in person so to make our contribution we recorded an audio ppt which you can download from the link above (it's 212MB so you'll want a reasonable internet connection). Let us know what you would do with a million links!

A huge thanks to Neil Coffee and all involved for bringing the session together.




Thursday, 13 November 2014

Bringing About the SEA CHANGE

About two weeks ago, on Friday October 31, we held the first of two annotation workshops funded through the Open Humanities Awards, designed to gather data through our Recogito "crowdsourcing" interface. The Heidelberg University Institute of Geography kindly agreed to be our host for this inaugural event. A big thank you goes to Lukas Loos for setting up our visit and taking care of local organization, and to Armin Volkmann for his spontaneous decision to merge his geo-archaeology seminar with our workshop on that day.

And with what an effect. We were blown away by the results! In just two hours, our 27 participants made 6.620 contributions to 51 different documents (19 text and 32 maps). We've written a comprehensive report over at the DM2E blog. Be sure not to miss it!

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Greece (is the Time, is the Place, is the Motion)


It turns out The Bee Gees were right. We've wrapped up work (for now) on Greek early geographic documents and the experience has made it clear that time, place and motion do indeed feature heavily.

First a few statistics. Our objective - as always - has been to identify sources for as many documents as we could, both in the original Greek and in modern translation. Wherever possible we have used open access, online materials so that people can access the texts and read them for themselves. This time we have identified some 66 works, of which we were able to obtain digital texts for 42 of them (and 8 in both languages). You can see our list of available texts on the Recogito public site and we’d be very happy to hear any suggestions for working with those texts which are still missing. Pau has been working like Greased Lightning over these long Summer Nights to produce a remarkable 48,000 edits (and counting)!

Pau has not been alone in this work either. We’ll talk more about the new Recogito Editors group in a future blog post, but for now we’d like to say an especially big thank you to Brady Kiesling who donated a large number of pre-annotated texts from his wonderful ToposText project, and even did some translation to boot. Shout-outs also go to Bruce Robertson, Greta Franzini and Monica Berti for their help in OCR’ing Greek geographic texts.

Thanks to Rainer’s hard work, the Recogito interface is really starting to shape up. Not only are new features such as detailed user- and document-stats being added regularly, but there’s now a tutorial for users, and various small enhancements were made to the front page (e.g. temporal ordering of documents, so that you can start to see the development of ancient geography at a glance). There are other major changes afoot for our third Content Workpackage on the early Christian tradition… but you’ll have to wait for another blog post to hear more about that.

Just like last time, we’ve generated a preliminary heatmap of our work on the Greek sources so far. Even incomplete as it is, it’s fascinating to see our authors focus not only on the Aegean Sea, Magna Graecia and the Black Sea, but also their explorations along the Red Sea, the Atlantic and even the Silk Road. 



So what about those sources? The list of documents we’ve been working with includes some of the biggest and most important in the history of geography, including Strabo, Herodotus and the immense Suda. We said that Greece was the place, but in fact what we are really talking about, and what emerges from these early investigations, is just how many places the "Greek world" comprises of and how many places "Greek knowledge" extends to. Time also plays an essential role. From Ptolemy’s "Hour Intervals", which divide up the world like the face of a huge celestial clock, to the Spartan Cleomenes's alarming realisation that it was not a matter of days to travel to the Persian capital but months, time is used to try to make sense of, or express bewilderment at, the vast distances being talked about. And Greek geography is not just static, but frequently in motion, with stadiasmoi, periploi, itineraries and even the occasional International Business Traveller. We hope you enjoy exploring these documents as much as we do. If you’d like to get involved and help us annotate the rest, please do get in touch. We'll go together like....

Thursday, 2 October 2014

“How many miles to Babylon?”

The answer to this famous nursery rhyme – “three score and ten”, i.e. 70 km – seems outrageously high for a day's journey, no matter “if your heels are [exceptionally] nimble and light”. (Even swift-footed Achilles would struggle to cover 70 km in day!) So, what are we to make of it? How can we evaluate such a distance number?

This is where the "database ancient measurements" comes in. The project was initially sponsored by Berlin's excellence cluster TOPOI and is managed now by my IT whiz Rainer Streng who set it up in MS Access and programmed data exports into "Google Earth" and applications in "ArcGIS 10". Irina Tupikova, who by day is an astronomer and mathematician, is also working on Ptolemy's data, recalculating the spherical coordinates to the original measurements.

As far as we know, there is no comparable collection of this kind. Right now, our database includes nearly 100 ancient authors and their works, especially ancient geographers and historians (Strabo, Pliny, Hero­do­tus, Thucydides etc.), but also minor authors like the pseudo-Aristotelian work de mundo or Horace's Satires. All in all we have in our database 2466 "distances", i.e., attested routes with two points and a number. (Among them eleven routes for Babylon, and even bigger figures for a "day´s journey" than the 70 km in the nursery rhyme, if you are interested!)

What can one do with these data? We think: a lot! To start with:

  • How accurate and reliable were ancient measurements data?
  • What units are attested and how do they relate to each other? This is a basic and notorious question in the field of ancient metrology.
  • Who measured or rather estimated distances in antiquity? Soldiers, explorers, merchants? Were there any attempts to map a whole country or empire and standardize the many distances in antiquity? If so, was this a "bottom-up" process done by practitioners like seamen or merchants or a "top-down" one, organized by a central administration?

But there are potentially much more searching questions, such as:

  • How does an ancient author employ numbers, especially distances as a means to engage with his readership, in order to bring home his own ideas or concepts? Authors like Herodotus or Thucydides were very careful (and sometimes even deceptive!) in using numbers in their narratives.
  • How can we use measurement data to explore one of the most basic, important and comparable properties of space is its extension, its spatiality? If researchers concern themselves with spaces, they should not ignore this aspect (as they mostly do). Distances are a means to evaluate the different concepts of space the ancients had in mind. But they allow us also to reconstruct not only the real maps of ancient geographers but also the "mental maps" of merchants, soldiers, intellectuals etc.
  • How can a corpus of ancient measurement data allow us to reconstruct ancient routes and waterways and, in addition, social phenomena like migration or mobility? The ambitious application Rainer works on now, is an ancient network of ancient routes and waterways (something like Orbis or Omnes Viae, but based on our measurement data).

To give just a small example:

The green line depicts the route between Tridentum and Rome, a route, which according
to the "codex Theodosianus" (6.28.1) can be covered in 34 days. 34 days of travel
are "normally" equivalent to c. 850 km (a day´s journey calculated as 25 km). The
linear distance according to Google Earth is 477.58 km. But our ArcGIS model shows that
the route on known Roman roads is in fact 90 km lon­ger, i.e. 567.40 km.

The meetings with the nimble-footed Pelagios team (zigzagging between several locations all over Berlin in one and a half days) helped us sharpen our own profile and scientific approach tremendously. Fine-tuning our data and making it compatible and interoperable with the other Pelagios partners will be undertaken over the upcoming months. Watch this space!

Monday, 29 September 2014

Taking to the high seas: introducing Pelagios phase 4

This month sees the start of another new and exciting phase of Pelagios. With funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council's Digital Transformations programme, we will be exploring the transformative potential of our linked open data network for doing research. In short our brief is to address the question, "ok, now we can link stuff online—so what?"

In response to the challenge posed by "data silos" (the mass of independently produced material uploaded onto the Web), since 2011 we have been developing the means of linking online resources via their common references to place. This has involved "annotating" the place names found in documents and aligning those references to a global gazetteer service (for the ancient world, this is Pleiades). Using Pleiades's Uniform Resource Identifiers (or "social security numbers") for each ancient place as our glue, it is now possible to agree that places mentioned in different materials are one and the same (e.g. Classical Athens and not "Athens, Georgia"). Users are now able to move seamlessly between and search the records of a growing list of international partners.

Thus each place annotation made in the document doesn’t just attach useful spatial information to a resource; it also provides a way of linking to other resources. But, as Andrew Prescott, leader of the AHRC’s Digital Transformations strand, has recently written: 'Scholarship is much harder than [the ability to link]: we need to be clear about why we are linking data, what sort of data we are linking, and our aim in doing so'. Our one-year grant from the AHRC looks to unlock the potential of our place network to reveal previously unknown connections between different places and different documents (texts, databases, maps, etc.).

In particular what we want to do is to use these new links between different documents to rethink key periods in the history of cartography. Until now digital resources have largely concerned issues of accuracy and visualization; i.e. to pinpoint the locations of ancient places with respect to our contemporary topography. What we want to do, rather, is to try to reconstruct and interpret the markedly different ways in which pre-modern authors and mapmakers conceptualized the world. Turning the spotlight on to five moments in time, Pelagios 4 will explore how ancient or pre-modern authors used various means to grasp, represent and communicate spatial knowledge of the world around them.

To conduct this research Pelagios is happy to announce the following scholarly collaborators:

  • Pascal Arnaud, Professor of History at UniversitĆ© Lyon 2 and senior member of the Institut universitaire de France (IUF), is the leading specialist in ancient geography and navigation.
  • Tony Campbell is former head of the British Library’s ‘Map Room’ and the pre-eminent expert on Portolan Charts.
  • Marianne O'Doherty, Lecturer in English at the University of Southampton, has published on medieval European travel narratives, geography and cartography.
  • Klaus Geus, Chair of Ancient Geography at FU Berlin, co-ordinates the TOPOI Excellence Cluster in ‘Common Sense Geography’. He is joined by Irina Tupikova, a leading mathematical astronomer with an interest in the history of science.

We look forward to working with these scholars and rethinking the ways in which geographic space was imagined and represented before the advent of modern Cartesian cartography.

Portolan chart by Jorge de Aguiar (1492), the oldest known
signed and dated chart of Portuguese origin.

Citation: "Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR" by Jorge de Aguiar - Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Yale, New Haven, USA. Licensed under Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Tuesday, 24 June 2014

What Have the Romans Ever Mapped for Us? Results from the Latin Geographic Tradition

Having recently completed our first content workpackage (CWP1), dedicated to Early Geospatial Documents from the Latin Tradition, we'd like to take this opportunity to share the annotation data that we've compiled so far. Overall we have completed annotating place references in 33 documents (41 if we include additional language versions of the same document). Within these documents, we've identified 19,880 toponyms, and were able to establish mappings to Pleiades in 15,721 cases (79%).

Spatial distribution of toponyms annotated in CWP1 - Latin Tradition

You can find the complete list of our documents, along with a download link for the data, below. The annotations are stored in CSV format - i.e. they can be opened in a spreadsheet application, or imported into a database or GIS.

An additional part of our work in CWP1 (which will be important too for all our content work packages) has been to identify additional relevant documents as we go along. Our list of "geospatial documents" has therefore grown quite substantially. We have included these documents in our annotation tool Recogito. You can follow their status directly on Recogito's Latin Tradition landing page.

Now that we have finished work on the first of our six traditions, we are keen to get your feedback. In particular:

  1. We look forward to seeing what and how you make use of these data. We're sure that you'll use them in ways that we can't anticipate, and we'd love you to share that with us!
  2. The large number of documents, the ambiguity of the evidence and the comparatively short space of time mean that some of our identifications will inevitably be wrong or open to debate. We are planning a mechanism to allow people to suggest alternative suggestions or to indicate agreement and disagreement. In the meantime, feel free to contact us if you have proposals for corrections. We're also happy to hear suggestions for other early latin geographic documents which we may have missed.
  3. Since, as we expected, we could not fully annotate or geo-resolve all of our documents, we're interested in hearing from people who might be willing to join us in the challenge. If you would like to join in and help find places in the incomplete documents, feel free to get in touch and we may be able to provide you with a Recogito account. We'll have to roll this out slowly since Recogito is not a 'community tool' as such (with features such as full moderation, user profiles, etc) so please be aware that there may be a wait if we get a lot of volunteers!

Thursday, 22 May 2014

Future Footnotes, Reverse References and Bottomless Maps

Pelagios and the Graph of Historical Data 
are continually evolving in a number of directions that can sometimes make it hard to answer the simple question: ‘What are the benefits?’ Regular readers will know that these are many and various (and by no means all accounted for) but in this blogpost we’d like to outline two important ones that we've been thinking about for a while. We call these ‘Future Footnotes’ and ‘Reverse References’ (more on Bottomless Maps at the...well...bottom). 

Footnotes and references are pretty much the defining feature of textual academic discourse. It isn’t enough to have a bright idea or discover something remarkable – we have to relate our ideas and discovery to a wider body of research in order to locate them in the scholarly debate. But both suffer from severe limitations: footnotes can only point backwards and references can only point outwards.

Footnotes allow us to provide additional information that provides context or authority for an idea in a text (or even an image in the form of captions). Sometimes they are descriptive, but more often than not they are cross-references to previously written material – as an author we obviously can’t know about future material at the time of writing.  Because the graph of historic data is continually growing, Pelagios links act as a Future Footnotes. Annotation allows us (and anyone else in fact) to create hooks that connect our texts to both old and new material as it becomes available, without having to manually update those links ourselves. So, for example, when we annotate a reference to Londinium, for example, we don’t just say ‘here are the other references to Londinium that I am aware of at the time I wrote this’, but ‘here are other references to Londinium that the community is aware of, at the time you are reading it’.

References, on the other hand, allow us to provide evidence that backs up a point that we are making. They unilaterally point outwards because we only have the opportunity to refer to other work. In contrast, by annotating content we are simultaneously contributing our information to a wider cloud and so we create a Reverse Reference – i.e. it becomes directly available to other people through their own annotations. And to flip the logic of Future Footnotes, we don’t merely make it available to works that will be annotated in the future, but we make it available to works that have already been annotated as well. Thus we immediately make our work more accessible to precisely the people who might find it interesting.

So the benefits of Pelagios, and the Graph of Historical Data in general, are that they both future-proof and mutualise the cross-referencing that underpins academia in a way that has never been possible before. The analogies to footnotes and references aren’t quite perfect because they don’t account for the authorial stance – i.e. the desire for an author to selectively identify content, but they do indicate how radical this development in one of the most fundamental practices of academia can be. 

There is one additional benefit that we also think is essential: because the graph is open and distributed, it’s possible to create services that allow for seamless interlinking between online resources. In other words, you don’t have to go to a centralised portal or search service to discover relevant material. You simply discover it naturally, through hyperlinked references and footnotes in online books or articles (or webpages, or pictures, or maps, or songs or videos...and so forth). 

Of course curated portals and search services are valuable too, which leads us to our Bottomless Maps. There has been much discussion of the Deep Map in recent years – interactive digital maps that contain content that extends beyond the visual surface. Bottomless Maps, like the Pelagios heatmap for example, link an ever-growing (and thus to all intents and purposes infinite) quantity of content to the places they depict. While the scope of the Pelagios project is restricted to historic geographic concepts, the model which we have been collaboratively developing is applicable to any other kind of reference (people, periods, classifications, canonical text citations, and so forth). An ecology of other projects is now springing up to support this, so the combined (and evolving) graph of humanities data will ultimately become much more significant than Pelagios itself. We look forward to a future in which such cross-referencing is just as commonplace as footnotes and references are today.

*We here expand the notion of the Graph of Ancient World Data to include any content of a historical, classical or archaeological nature.